Feminism vs. Male Sexuality

Feminism vs. Male Sexuality

By Kevin Biomech

Males in our culture are damned. Not because of what we do, or even what we did or thought, but because we are male. It has become de rigeur to bash all things male, so much so that you might even find yourself believing it. In particular, feminists like to damn our sexuality. Not because they find any good reason, but because it's our biggest weakness as well as our greatest strength. Enemies always look for the loosest armour or the weakest walls.

I recently had a woman ask me, and I believe she was sincere, if I really *thought* that feminism intended to deny male sexuality. My answer was no, I don't think it, I know it. I cited some examples, and I shall do so again in this article. But first a bit of ranting.

Sexuality is a natural function. A healthy, heterosexual male wants sex. Sexual attractiveness is what draws us toward women, whatever else we may hope to get from a relationship. THIS IS NOT A BAD THING!!! Women too are drawn to a "sexy" man, but rationalise it to mean something other, or just go through the whole "men only want one thing" mantra. They are very wrong. Men do indeed want sex. So do women, though apparently to a much lesser degree (I'll get back to this). What most of us also want, to a greater or lesser extent depending on the man, is a LOYAL companion who is on our side when things go bad, and who will share in our triumphs. Women, on the other hand, want a guy who's ALREADY immensely successful. Future potential is something they have been conditioned to ignore.

Yet in the past, men were very often driven to greater heights and successes BECAUSE of their wives and lovers, rather than in spite of them as is now generally the case. Women in the past understood something implicitly that now has to be explicitly stated, because feminism has indoctrinated so many otherwise decent women to BELIEVE that men are shallow, unimaginitive, untalented sex machines. The evidence against this position is of course everywhere in our society. Feminazis spew their venom from keyboards and computers designed and built by men. They drive cars designed and built by men. They use appliances, live in houses, consume medicines and luxuries, almost exclusively the domain of men. Yet we are the enemy. And indeed, in this day and age, we ARE the enemy. It's not a war we chose, nor one that most of us want to fight. Despite what they say about us, a great many of us would LOVE to have the affection and loyalty of a good woman.

Most men are protective of women, even when we KNOW that such is going to bring us no rewards. It's hardwired. Being a true misogynist, as the excellent article "Hate Bounces" so poignantly illustrates, is almost NEVER a natural state. It comes about from women abusing our image, our emotions, our natural protectiveness, and instintive "chivalry" for quite some time. It comes from the OBVIOUS fact that modern women just plain don't like us, and a great many of them would like to hurt us. Mostly over imagined slights.

Male sexuality is consistently demonised in the media, and on the lips and hearts of most women in America. They like to claim that we want to rape every attractive woman we see. This is of course bullshit of the lowest order, but they BUY it! Yes, men are easily sexually aroused. No, this doesn't mean we're going to grab the nearest "hottie" and have our way with her. If we were the way they claim, porn wouldn't be much of an industry. Speaking of porn, feminists like to claim that porn is about domination. Occasionally it is, but in general, what we REALLY like about the porno girls is that they seem to actually WANT and ENJOY sex. Of course it's a fantasy, like any other entertainment piece, but in the films, the women don't make it impossible to be a sexual being, and they don't use their pussies as currency. They act the impression that they actually want to be with a man for his own sake and enjoy sex.

Feminists find this terrible. They have come up with a sick fantasy that ALL heterosexual sex is an act of rape. Willingness can't exist in their paradigm, because it makes the act one of pleasure rather than victimization. They claim on the one hand that women can be strong and independent (some can) and that they are to weak to make an informed decision or give consent. That these two positions are polar opposites don't seem to knot their brow one bit. For some reason, perhaps because women are gullible, or maybe they just hate us, most women buy this sick fantasy. That all sex *with men* is evil. Yet that is how the race continues. How can that be evil? Rape is evil, as is any initiatory violent act. Sex is supposed to be one of life's greatest pleasures, and would be without all the attitude attached.

Now somebody reading this is inevitably going to say "feminism don't want to deny male sexuality". To them, here are a few quotes from the leaders of feminism. Let me reiterate that, because the next argument they will inevitably lay on your ears is that "Oh, that's just the opinion of a few fringy people". So, I'm going to shout this point out: THESE QUOTES ARE MAINSTREAM! THEY ARE FROM THE LEADERS OF THE FEMINIST MOVEMENT, ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION! Now that we've taken away the wiggle room, here's what these "wonderful feminists" are and were saying about male sexuality:

"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it "Her". Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination."
Pornography: Men Possessing Women - Andrea Dworkin

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist"
Amazon Odyssey (p. 86) - Ti-Grace Atkinson

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..."
- Sheila Jeffrys

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies."
- Andrea Dworkin

Now, I want to touch on the quote above for a moment. Guys, have you ever wanted to have sex with a woman BECAUSE you felt contempt for her body? Or more the opposite? Yeah, that's what I thought... But women BELIEVE this shit. Here's some more drivel from our enemies:

"All men are rapists and that's all they are."
Author; (later, advisor to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.) - Marilyn French

"As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE."
(Her emphasis) - Marilyn French

Now, in my world, the one I see with my eyes, taste with my tongue, smell with my nose, hear with my ears, and touch with my skin, this just isn't even vaguely the case. The VAST majority of men are opposed to such actions, violently. I personally would have no qualms nor lose any sleep over pulling the trigger on a rapist. Most men I've known in my life have held the same views. Most of us understand something that I don't think any modern woman does. We know we are physically superiour to women. We are aware that we can break her pretty little neck without that much effort. Therefore, since we are such monsters, we've developed a protective attitude, and a very masculine taboo AGAINST harming women. There used to be an implicit understanding between men and women that went something like this: I, the male, can break you at will. I will NOT do this, and you, the female, will not deliberately act to provoke me. This is common politeness, and common sense. Many, by their own words, "victims" of Domestic Violence threw the first several punches. They weren't strong enough to win the day, so they called their REAL lover, the cops. Yet, if we were the monsters they claim, how many of them would get away with it? We are, for the most part, physically able to destroy these hysterical women with our hands. Yet I've taken FAR more physical abuse from a woman than I ever would for a man. "never strike a woman" is so deeply inscribed in our culture that most men don't even THINK about the reasons for our restraint. Women take advantage of this, rather than taking it as the complement and gift that it really is. How many of you would accept a man slapping you in the face or elbowing you in the ribs (hard, not playful) and just stand and take it? not many, I would imagine. Yet almost all of us will at some point deal with this with the women in our lives. And the vast majority of us DON'T strike back.

Feminism also wishes to destroy marriage. This would seem obvious from the above, but the women out there seem to deny this. Why? Because despite the contradictory belief system they are swimming in, most women would like to have a man in their lives, just as we want a woman in ours. So they will pretend that their leaders didn't say what they did, or put a "what the captain meant was..." spin on it. So, here's what the Captain said:

"The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together.... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the breakup of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.... No woman should have to deny herself any opportunities because of her special responsibilities to her children...."
"Functions of the Family," WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969 - Linda Gordon

"We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage."
From Sisterhood Is Powerful, (ed), 1970, p. 537 - Robin Morgan

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman."
- Catherine MacKinnon

" How will the family unit be destroyed? ...[T]he demand alone will throw the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin establishing a community of work with each other and we can fight collectively. Women will feel freer to leave their husbands and become economically independent, either through a job or welfare."
In "Female Liberation" - Roxanne Dunbarr

Or of course, the one we've all heard from Gloria Steinem, grand high executioner for the feminist cause "A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle".

So, we are damned because we desire women. We're also damned if we don't. we're damned if we don't strike them down, and we are damned if we do. What can be done? Very little, except to give them what they deserve: Isolation. They want to call us commitment phobes? First they need to learn what commitment is. They need to learn that when you make a promise (vow), you fucking had BETTER keep it or face stiff consequences. They need to be loyal to their chosen men, and they need to stop bashing us no matter what we do. The ball is truly in their court. Most of us have tried VERY HARD to be the kind of man they claim they want, only to watch them slut themselve out with the guys the claim over and over again to despise... Maybe to THEM sex is contempt for the male body?

Women don't seem to have much of a sex drive. They claim otherwise, but the fact is that it's MEN who must initiate, MEN who have to beg for a little taste, and WOMEN who use their sex as currency or manipulation. They claim again and again that men "only want one thing". It's not true, but because of their idiotic ideology, it's all they're willing to offer.

I say, and I know a lot of you agree, that we should turn our back on American women altogether. Let the feminists create their "paradise". Much of the world still has human women in it, women who have at least some inkling of both the duties and IMPORTANCE of being a loving wife. 50 years of rampant feminism have erased both the idea of honorable marriage, and the capacity for it in the modern western female. They, along with other elements that support and demand big central governance, have destroyed our once great Nation from within far better than any enemy ever could have from without. They have made being male a crime, and still it's not enough for them. If we don't give in, if we too deny our sexuality until we find someone WORTHY of our attention, who has more to offer than just sex, then they will FAST run out of options. They'll either have to learn to pull their share, or go extinct. Feminists are not fast learners, so I think they will go extinct. But a great many women infected by feminism will see what's happening, and after they quit whining, may change their wicked wicked ways.